If Curry’s red card is upheld what about the other head clashes that were unpunished across the opening weekend? Photograph: Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images What if England had lost to Argentina having played almost the entire game with 14 players, only for Curry’s card to be subsequently rescinded? And if Curry’s red is downgraded back to a yellow, what does that say about the whole bunker concept? This matters hugely because the margins between the leading teams are tighter than they have ever been. When is a red not a red? And vice versa? Not everyone seems wholly sure. Or, to be a touch more accurate, shades of rosé. Instead there are still far too many shades of grey. The beefed-up “bunker review” system, now involving two officials, was meant to reduce the uncertainty and jeopardy. These are precisely the conversations rugby’s authorities did not want to hear in the early days of the competition. If it is, what about a number of other head clashes over the weekend? On social media an awful lot of people are discussing Curry’s collision with Juan Cruz Malliá and wondering why South Africa’s Jesse Kriel, Chile’s Martín Sigren and Wales’s Dan Biggar received lesser sanctions. We do not yet know, for example, whether the high-profile sending-off of England’s Tom Curry, the earliest red card in World Cup history, will definitely be upheld when his case is heard this week. But if a primary aim of a World Cup is to woo new fans rather than leave everyone looking confused, the opening weekend once again raised more questions than it answered. No surprise, perhaps, given the litany of laws and sub-clauses and the near-impossible job facing referees. Rugby has so much to offer the neutral fan but it still struggles badly when it comes to refereeing and disciplinary consistency. Had they managed a last-gasp try to complete a stunning comeback at Wales’s expense, the post-match visuals would have been seriously epic.Īnd yet. Will you be copping a pair? Let us know in the comments section.Perhaps, instead, you preferred the impromptu Welsh choirs in the centre of Bordeaux, the bouncing enthusiasm of thousands of France and Argentina fans or kilted Scots and green-shirted Bokke diehards mixing happily in the Mediterranean sunshine. The Curry Flow 8 is set to drop on December 11th at the tune of $160. How long before other top notch sneaker brands begin to bite UA’s new innovative tech? This is the most excited I’ve been about the opportunity and potential of new technology in a very long time.” “I’ve proudly spent 20+ years working in product innovation creating the best technology available for athletes. “When we saw how sticky this material was on hardwood, we knew this was going to be groundbreaking,” said Fred Dojan, Under Armour Innovation’s VP of Footwear Development. The new UA Flow technology that Chef Curry will be rocking come next season took 1500 man hours of testing and utilized more than 100 athletes to perfect, so you know it’s going to be a problem on the court. The Curry Flow 8 effectively disrupts the design of a traditional basketball shoe by completely eliminating the rubber outsole, bringing unparalleled traction, lightweight performance ground-contact cushioning and grippy on-court feel. UA Flow is positioned to shift the company and the entire sports apparel industry. The silhouette marks the introduction of an industry-changing cushioning platform, called UA Flow.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |